Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
1–10 of 110 posts
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#2Can I create a pointer to a pointer?
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#3How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#4How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
I found it more amusing that he listed 8 languages that he has experience with and then went out of his way to exclude JavaScript.
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#5I like the second option (&int(3)) the most personally, as I find myself occasionally defining a bunch of variables before I can use them as pointers in structs. It looks and feels a lot cleaner to use this vs having new everywhere.
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#6How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
I found it more amusing that he listed 8 languages that he has experience with and then went out of his way to exclude JavaScript.
Is JavaScript a language?
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#7How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
I found it more amusing that he listed 8 languages that he has experience with and then went out of his way to exclude JavaScript.
When you know JavaScript enough to be able to say that you don't know JavaScript.
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#8How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
> Is this about generics?
> No.
Not sure why, but something about this being the (first part of the) last question he had to answer makes it quite funny to me.
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found it more amusing that he listed 8 languages that he has experience with and then went out of his way to exclude JavaScript.
Is JavaScript a language?
Please don't use HN comments for posting low-quality jokes, even if (perhaps "especially if") they're considered acceptable/appropriate for other communities.
Re: Proposal: expression to create pointer to simple types
#10How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
Personally, I like the 100% correct answer to
Can you describe a possible implementation? (Yes.)