Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#2One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over the long term
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#3This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
This sounds like a good thing to me. Why will it turn out badly?
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#4This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
Call me skeptical, but I don't think the average person would share in the benefit of that efficiency.
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#5This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
> Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. This sounds like a good thing to me. Why will it turn out badly?
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#6This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#7This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
> and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. Call me skeptical, but I don't think the average person would share in the benefit of that efficiency.
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#8This will turn out badly. Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. Otoh, their cost of capital is lower, and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. One useful thing though is that corporate owners dont need to sell, so transaction and mtg taxes will be lower over…
According to [1], the average rate (or prime rate?) right now is 3.18% for a 30 year mortgage. OTOH, rate for 30 year "High Quality Market Corporate Bond" is 3.38%.
> and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing.
They might be more efficient at being landlords, but that doesn't exactly translate into higher efficiency when it comes to providing housing. Owning a house and doing the repairs yourself is probably much cheaper than hiring someone to do it, not to mention you save all the taxes on the imputed rent.
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#9... and property taxes.
Re: Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, driving up prices
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and they are more efficient managers than individual homeowners, so this might be a more efficient way of providing housing. Call me skeptical, but I don't think the average person would share in the benefit of that efficiency.
I’ve moved every 12-18 months for the past 10 years and rented everywhere. I’m one datapoint but apartments/property managers have been way better than private owners. The private owners always seem to be figuring out for the first time how to repair anything, always trying to save money, and have always tried to hold my deposit illegally. I’m pretty sure when these landlords talk to each other about “having someone…
It makes a lot of sense, but I understand your frustration. Still not nearly as frustrating as hauling trailers full of other peoples trash and dog shit out of your own house and then having to repair thousands of dollars worth of damage to cabinets, drywall, carpet, and paint.