Next.js 10.1
nextjs.org
Next.js 10.1
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Next.js 10.1
#2> Improved Installation Time: 58% smaller install size and 56% fewer dependencies.
Great to see NextJS putting effort to reduce dependencies.
Re: Next.js 10.1
#3> 3x Faster Refresh: 200ms faster refresh with no changes necessary.
Good. Refresh time and compile time feel like biggest drawbacks to Next right now.
Re: Next.js 10.1
#4> Improved Installation Time: 58% smaller install size and 56% fewer dependencies. Great to see NextJS putting effort to reduce dependencies.
Definitely! I would love to hear what kind of replacements they had to make:
>As part of our goal to optimize dependencies, we also updated and/or replaced npm packages that were marked as deprecated by their authors – even when they were deeply nested in the dependency tree.
I wonder if they just rewrote some smaller packages themselves, or if they managed to find a maintained alternative for all of them?
Re: Next.js 10.1
#5I'm super excited about NextJS releases, but there has been a persistent memory leak issue is absolutely killer for larger projects: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/15855. It's so difficult to debug, but dang, it's just brutal to deal with on a daily basis. Hoping some of these dependency reductions help.
Re: Next.js 10.1
#6I just wanted to say next.js was the first frontend framework I learnt, It just keeps getting better.
Re: Next.js 10.1
#7> Improved Installation Time: 58% smaller install size and 56% fewer dependencies. Great to see NextJS putting effort to reduce dependencies.
Definitely! I would love to hear what kind of replacements they had to make: >As part of our goal to optimize dependencies, we also updated and/or replaced npm packages that were marked as deprecated by their authors – even when they were deeply nested in the dependency tree. I wonder if they just rewrote some smaller packages themselves, or if they managed to find a maintained alternative for all of them?
They often compile stuff and just check it into their tree.