Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
drive.google.com
Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
1–10 of 97 posts
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#2> Rectifying The Situation: 80 hours per week should be considered max capacity
That's not tone deaf or anything.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#3Is anyone here experiencing this? It must be really tough.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#4> Rectifying The Situation: 80 hours per week should be considered max capacity That's not tone deaf or anything.
I think it's the analysts writing these slides.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#5I wonder what they actually "do" for 95 hours a week. There is no way it can be productive work for all that time over such long periods.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#6I wonder what they actually "do" for 95 hours a week. There is no way it can be productive work for all that time over such long periods.
Reading through 300-page contracts and the like, then making a powerpoint representation of it.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#7in any cycle of abuse, bad treatment is a feature and not a bug.
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#8It would be great to hear directly from somewhere who works at GS - anyone here spending some of their 98 hours on HN?
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#9According to overwhelming opinion on HN they should be able to do more if they worked 20-30 hours a week. Clueless bankers!
Re: Goldman Sachs Working Conditions Survey
#10I don't think these are the people that deserve our sympathy. What did they think? That they would get rich by defrauding the world only 40 hours a week?
> mentally I’m in a really dark place
Indeed. First find some morals, then try again.