Live data from Hacker News

There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]

bbk.ac.uk

1–10 of 88 posts

Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]

#6
His argument is very time/context dependent. Our understanding of computer art is quite different now, in 2021, than it was in 1971 since the capabilities and ease of use of computers are very different. His point about art dealers is still interesting though.

Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]

#8
post #3

Semantics I think. I do not see much difference for example between Pollock's artwork and some of computer generated stuff.

Which of Pollock's works? Until I saw a drip paining in a museum, I always thought it was a dull, lifeless, messy Kindergarten style, but the actual work was quite impressive in its sheer physical presence. It was rather different from the usual pictures in books and magazines. Seeing Mondriaan (or: Mondrian, as he's known in the English speaking part of the world) was different: his paintings look great in books, but are small and quite imperfect in reality.
Post reply on HN