There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
1–10 of 88 posts
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#2I changed the url from https://compart.uni-bremen.de/download/publications/there-sh..., which does a forced download. If there's a better page to link to, we can change it again.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#3Semantics I think. I do not see much difference for example between Pollock's artwork and some of computer generated stuff.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#4There was a time I was deeply involved in procedural generated art. Everything has changed since I started working. But hey, I got come pretty cool experiments from that fase. Like this one:
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#5If it weren't for computers, my hobby artistic endeavors would still be about acquiring a steady pulse so that the lines just look right...
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#6His argument is very time/context dependent. Our understanding of computer art is quite different now, in 2021, than it was in 1971 since the capabilities and ease of use of computers are very different. His point about art dealers is still interesting though.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#7Computer art is not ok as much as paintbrush art is not ok.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#8Semantics I think. I do not see much difference for example between Pollock's artwork and some of computer generated stuff.
Which of Pollock's works? Until I saw a drip paining in a museum, I always thought it was a dull, lifeless, messy Kindergarten style, but the actual work was quite impressive in its sheer physical presence. It was rather different from the usual pictures in books and magazines. Seeing Mondriaan (or: Mondrian, as he's known in the English speaking part of the world) was different: his paintings look great in books, but are small and quite imperfect in reality.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#9I've read this a couple times and can't really figure out what the argument is. Something about alienating artists from their art? And also the bourgeoisie is involved? I did notice that they narrowed their claim a couple times as the article went on.
Re: There Should Be No Computer Art (1971) [pdf]
#10My tangentially related thoughts on the matter
https://wndr.xyz/posts/9fjM1tOJO7MWX4fYw3AU2Q==/what-s-art-a...