How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
theguardian.com
How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#2Also, I'm a big fan of regex. I think -- probably thanks to jwz's famous quote -- a lot of younger programmers avoid them but they're fantastic for MATCHING. Using them in a Google sheet is a killer MVP to prove out something like this.
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#3Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#4Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#5For those unaware "Grauniad" is a decades-old nickname for The Guardian, used particularly by satirical mag Private Eye in reference to its reputation at one time for typos and the like. https://wordhistories.net/2017/06/05/origin-of-grauniad/
Well-earned into the present day. I regularly see typos even today.
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#6Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#7For those unaware "Grauniad" is a decades-old nickname for The Guardian, used particularly by satirical mag Private Eye in reference to its reputation at one time for typos and the like. https://wordhistories.net/2017/06/05/origin-of-grauniad/
> reputation at one time for typos and the like Well-earned into the present day. I regularly see typos even today.
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
> reputation at one time for typos and the like Well-earned into the present day. I regularly see typos even today.
name me a tier-1 paper without typos. the point about the graun, is how entertaining they could be.
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
name me a tier-1 paper without typos. the point about the graun, is how entertaining they could be.
Honestly I don't see that many typos in other papers; grammatical issues, sure. But it would appear that not knowing what the squiggly red underlined words are is a requirement of being a Graun writer or editor.
I have a deep antipathy to Murdoch press, having said that they used to have remarkably high editorial standards in the Australian flagship newspaper (called "The Australian") and when News Ltd went on a cost cutting drive, around the time of the collapse of their main competitor, Fairfax Ltd (caused by Warwick fairfax, who basically wrecked the empire: he now consults in the USA on .. how to be a successful entrepreneur!) It merged a huge amount of sub-editor functions into a JV with Fairfax, which subsequently basically failed in-place: They sacked the good staff, and kept an out-source agency which had no clue. The Oz, is now pretty U/S for basic grammar AND spelling.
They also routinely now do pun leads. This was funny for about half a second, ever. The Graun also does far too many pun leads. I think all newspapers wind up there.
A good fictional account of news headlines and the journalistic pressures of newspaper writing in happier days is in "leaven of malice" by Robertson Davies: a fictional Canadian newspaper, beset by a cruel trick played in "hatches, matches and dispatches" -"The Shipping News" has its moments too.
Re: How we made Typerighter, the Guardian’s style guide checker
#10They even have a snippet of Scala code. I feel like HN must be the target audience