The value of science (1955) [pdf]
calteches.library.caltech.edu
The value of science (1955) [pdf]
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#2There are many interesting points in this piece that are worthy of further discussion but I just wanted to call out for appreciation one of the most poetic passages here:
“Stands at the sea... wonders at wondering... I... a universe of atoms... an atom in the universe”
Beautiful, and also for me personally very charming because I hear it in Feynman’s voice as I have heard it in numerous videos and audio recordings, so down to earth and with the same kind of Long Island accent that my paternal grandmother had.
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#3Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#4Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#5Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#6-AE
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#7Interesting read, but was the article printed like that, or maybe someone scanned it with a 20th century scanner? :)
You can find it retranscribed here http://www.faculty.umassd.edu/j.wang/feynman.pdf or there http://alexpetrov.com/memes/sci/value.html
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#8Feynman is a legend
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#9Feynman is a legend
But not without flaws (it's hard to know how much truth there is with the women - definitely a womaniser, possibly abusive but that could be just be for the divorce - but Gell-Manns criticism of him is pretty funny)
My view is to value the work and leave the personal side out of things — with the same token, we should not over idolize people and expect them to be our saviors outside their chosen field. Celebrity worship is bad, they are just humans after all.
I should rephrase my original comment as “Richard Feynman is a legend in Physics”.
Re: The value of science (1955) [pdf]
#10Feynman is a legend
But not without flaws (it's hard to know how much truth there is with the women - definitely a womaniser, possibly abusive but that could be just be for the divorce - but Gell-Manns criticism of him is pretty funny)
Curious - should someone who as consensual casual affairs with women be labeled as a "flaw"?