Live data from Hacker News

The Imaginary Phone

hpi.uni-potsdam.de

1–3 of 3 posts

Re: The Imaginary Phone

#2
Every phone I've used (except the first) has been modal - you have to look at the screen to see what it's done. Is it asleep? Is it in screen-saver? Has an alarm gone off?

The first phone I ad I could drive without looking. every other phone I first have to see what it thinks is happening, before I have a conversation.

And it reacts differently according to stuff I can't always know, such as whether a message has arrived, or similar.

Phone interfaces would need substantial changes for this to work, changes I'd like to see. I hate the modality.

Re: The Imaginary Phone

#3

Every phone I've used (except the first) has been modal - you have to look at the screen to see what it's done. Is it asleep? Is it in screen-saver? Has an alarm gone off? The first phone I ad I could drive without looking. every other phone I first have to see what it thinks is happening, before I have a conversation. And it reacts differently according to stuff I can't always know, such as whether a message has arr…

I totally agree. I think this project is taking the whole user interface paradigm to wrong way. It's confining the usability to the limitations of an existing design, which is not a good approach for anything.