Decentralised Content Moderation
martin.kleppmann.com
Decentralised Content Moderation
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Decentralised Content Moderation
#2Here's a tldr;
>spammers, neo-nazis, and child pornographers (or any other type of content that you consider despicable)
>Wikipedia editors are predominantly white, male
>it may be appropriate to take into account the power relationships between the people involved, and hold the privileged and powerful to a higher standard than the oppressed and disadvantaged, since otherwise the system may end up reinforcing existing imbalances
Re: Decentralised Content Moderation
#3Here's a tldr; >spammers, neo-nazis, and child pornographers (or any other type of content that you consider despicable) >Wikipedia editors are predominantly white, male >it may be appropriate to take into account the power relationships between the people involved, and hold the privileged and powerful to a higher standard than the oppressed and disadvantaged, since otherwise the system may end up reinforcing existin…
That's an interesting take home from the article.
What I got from it was "We can create distributed social networks that are censorship resistant (this is a problem with technical solutions), but that isn't necessarily a good idea. Some form of decentralised moderation process is also needed (which is both a social and technical problem)."
Re: Decentralised Content Moderation
#4The author is a researcher on distributed systems. I found this video from him to be an excellent first education on CRDTs, how they work, what they're good for and what they aren't (yet) good for:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7drE24geUw