The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
groups.google.com
The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
1–10 of 31 posts
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#2This is based on https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg, which is a patched version of https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#3Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#4I no longer work for the company that would have used it, but I'd gently suggest that it would not be a good idea to let it die.
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#5This is libjpeg-turbo needing funding, the current title is clickbaity
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#6Can someone please change the title so it reflects the content? This is libjpeg-turbo needing funding, the current title is clickbaity
I've seen a number of similar postings here, with similar titles.
I agree that it doesn't necessarily convey the stated goal of the posting, but I wouldn't call it "clickbaity."
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#7Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#8Additionally, the email talks about funding in hours of development work, but doesn't mention what each hour costs... would be helpful information to have in order to size a donation.
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#9It feels like patio11‘s comment on donating vs. paying for open source software should be linked to from here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10863939
patio11's comment is about donating vs. paying by a business entity. Something I hadn't considered is that a business (even if it's just a one-person developer who has incorporated) can pay for software tax-free to any org as long as it's an actual business expense, since businesses (at least in the US, and I assume in Japan as well) are taxed on their profits, not on their gross income.
Patrick's issue with donating as a business makes sense: the tax authorities will look at a donation and think it's a part of a tax-avoidance scheme, but if the business pays for a license to software (even the payment is essentially a part of a custom license, and the software is also available for free under the same or similar terms), and has that payment documented, it's fine.
Re: The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
#10I would consider donating, but I'd frankly prefer to donate to tax-exempt orgs. That way I can donate more with the same effective "cost" to myself. I get that it's not trivial to set one of these up (especially for someone who is already in a funding deficit), but I think it would make donations a more attractive option for people. Additionally, the email talks about funding in hours of development work, but doesn't…
So Open Collective has another fiscal host for charities and those donations are tax deductible, and I'm now trying to figure out what the difference really is as I'd like to set up my own charitable organization to fund a farming robot I am developing.
Anyway I could almost just say Libjpeg-turbo could set up an opencollective as their whole mission is to solve the paperwork problem for open source projects, but for whatever reason their open source software donations aren't actually tax deductible...
Does anyone here know about this IRS issue?