Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#2I'm for cool research, but I am also tired of the trend where security companies come up with a flashy name, logo, url, etc. for every exploit/vuln.
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#3I'm for cool research, but I am also tired of the trend where security companies come up with a flashy name, logo, url, etc. for every exploit/vuln.
Why?
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#4Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#5This is from September 2019. They haven't really bothered with updating the topic since then: https://www.adaptivemobile.com/search/3a08888ea06c35015d1248...
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#6So which company, working for which government, and how to stop it? The article is just a talk-to-our-salesman piece?
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#7So which company, working for which government, and how to stop it? The article is just a talk-to-our-salesman piece?
Yep, it's all fluff. They were supposed to reveal more information on the matter in a conference back in October. But we still only have a "technical" paper with nice looking graphs and an unnamed boogie-man.
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why?
It reeks of marketing, which is antithetical to the hacker spirit?
Good.. Instantly recognisable name for e-peen augmentation, enters lexicon of general public easily, media outlets can spam it easier, vendors hand forced to fix promptly.
This is hardly a bad thing.
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#9This is from September 2019. They haven't really bothered with updating the topic since then: https://www.adaptivemobile.com/search/3a08888ea06c35015d1248...
Dead link?
Re: Simjacker vulnerability exploited by surveillance companies
#10So which company, working for which government, and how to stop it? The article is just a talk-to-our-salesman piece?
This product/company, for example: https://rayzone.com/geomatrix-geolocation-system/