July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
#2At first glance I thought the title inferred that Tumblr hadn't increased in traffic in two years, which was very confusing. A better title would be something along the lines of "Tumblr now does as much traffic in one day as it used to do in one month."
Re: July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
#3At first glance I thought the title inferred that Tumblr hadn't increased in traffic in two years, which was very confusing. A better title would be something along the lines of "Tumblr now does as much traffic in one day as it used to do in one month."
I had the same confusion, and the sentence which explains it was less than clear to me - I had to reread it to be clear on what it was saying.
That's damn impressive.
Re: July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
#4holy fucking wow. I knew that tumblr rocked, but not that much.
Re: July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
#5At first glance I thought the title inferred that Tumblr hadn't increased in traffic in two years, which was very confusing. A better title would be something along the lines of "Tumblr now does as much traffic in one day as it used to do in one month."
I think if "09" was changed to "2009" it would be much clearer. Especially as the full year is already used for 2011 in the same headline.
Re: July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr Did… 250 Million PgV
#6Really bad title, were you trying to optimize it for twitter?
On the first read it sounded (to me) like nothing had changed, it wasn't until I actually clicked through and read the full headline that it made sense.