Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
theglobeandmail.com
Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
1–10 of 59 posts
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#2https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/khin4c/n_m...
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#3Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#4It looks like this company raised ~$250M, and sold for $230M. This isn't any sort of nefarious "founders got wiped out"; they sold for less money than they raised and this is the typical outcome in that situation.
Also, from the article:
> As part of the deal – which will see ServiceNow keep Element AI’s research scientists and patents and effectively abandon its business – the buyer has agreed to pay US$10-million to key employees and consultants including Mr. Gagne and Dr. Bengio as part of a retention plan.
This is the kind of "everyone got wiped out but the founders got an out-of-band parachute" that highlights an often-understated difference between "founders" and "just an employee". Even with a terrible outcome, founders and top executives can still manage to come out on top, and only employees actually get wiped out.
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#5Paywall copy from reddit https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/khin4c/n_m...
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#6If you’re a founder and you ever are doing a big round try to seek for secondary liquidity. It’s fair for founders to have some way to build financial stability when they are sacrificing so much. Secondary liquidity terms are way common nowadays than they used to be.
Element AI founders should have done that when they did their Series B and raised 150MM.
I know there are some purists that think that giving founders secondary liquidity can remove certain accountability, but honestly if you’re investing in a group of people and you believe giving them some reasonable path to partial liquidity pre-exit, you probably have some fundamental doubts on that investment and that group of people. I feel that nowadays that’s basically a litmus test for investment strength.
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#7Still, they have $300,000 worth of shares and "the buyer has agreed to pay US$10-million to key employees and consultants including Mr. Gagne and Dr. Bengio as part of a retention plan".
Business doesn't always work out. Getting a cool $1M after trying and failing is not the worst thing that could happen.
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#8The actual title is "Element AI sold for $230-million as founders saw value mostly wiped out". This is an important difference, since the submitted title here implies they were entirely wiped out. It looks like this company raised ~$250M, and sold for $230M. This isn't any sort of nefarious "founders got wiped out"; they sold for less money than they raised and this is the typical outcome in that situation. Also, fro…
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#9This has been bothering me for a while. Ridiculous sums of money invested purely on name recognition, in particular in 'AI', rather than allocating capital to people who actually at least have a product.
Re: Element AI sold for $230M, as founders saw value mostly wiped out: document
#10This has led to countless headaches. The skills needed to solve these challenges are very different. My more academically minded colleagues don't seem to have the intuition for seeing around this corner and understanding what it takes to build something that actually works.
This is a long way of saying: if a company is founded by and ran by such academics, I can see how this would be a recipe for disaster when it came to actually building and shipping products.