Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
aws.amazon.com
Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#2Edit: The example from their pricing page:
> We will assume you have 1 end user monitoring a dashboard for an average of 2 hours per day refreshing it every 60 seconds with 20 chart widgets per dashboard (assuming 1 PromQL query per widget)... assuming 18ms per query for this example.
Comes out to over $3 per month in query costs. Replace this 1 person with a TV showing the dashboard all day, and the cost jumps to $36, for just one dashboard and (again IME) overly fast query estimates... o.O
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#314 cents per "query processing minute" sounds like it could add up very fast. Prom queries can get somewhat complex and it's not rare at all IME to have a dashboard making several multi-second queries per load (whether that falls into "you're using Prometheus wrong" being a separate discussion of course) Edit: The example from their pricing page: > We will assume you have 1 end user monitoring a dashboard for an aver…
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#414 cents per "query processing minute" sounds like it could add up very fast. Prom queries can get somewhat complex and it's not rare at all IME to have a dashboard making several multi-second queries per load (whether that falls into "you're using Prometheus wrong" being a separate discussion of course) Edit: The example from their pricing page: > We will assume you have 1 end user monitoring a dashboard for an aver…
Does it put any limits on cardinality of metrics? Grafana cloud's offering was absolutely awful for my use cases. They charge per-series so if you have metrics with a "pod=..." label your prices go through the roof.
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#514 cents per "query processing minute" sounds like it could add up very fast. Prom queries can get somewhat complex and it's not rare at all IME to have a dashboard making several multi-second queries per load (whether that falls into "you're using Prometheus wrong" being a separate discussion of course) Edit: The example from their pricing page: > We will assume you have 1 end user monitoring a dashboard for an aver…
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#6Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it put any limits on cardinality of metrics? Grafana cloud's offering was absolutely awful for my use cases. They charge per-series so if you have metrics with a "pod=..." label your prices go through the roof.
Plenty has been written about not using the server/container/pod id as a label because it leads to high cardinality which leads to poor performance (cost aside). Time series databases have been purpose-built for certain workloads and you can consider this their weakness.
[0] - https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/management-tools/sre-...
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plenty has been written about not using the server/container/pod id as a label because it leads to high cardinality which leads to poor performance (cost aside). Time series databases have been purpose-built for certain workloads and you can consider this their weakness.
Plenty has also been written about the bugs/issues that have cropped up that are only visible when inspecting what regions/nodes/cgroups an issue is coming from [0]. My use case wasn't exactly `pod=...` but it was very similar. It was more like `device=...`. Also, for a huge application, it's not uncommon to have 100s or even 1000s of metrics that are important to application health/performance. Constantly saying "do…
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#9Yeah I dunno about this, and the grafana service. They’re not exactly complicated to run on their own. At this pricing you may as well be on Datadog.
Re: Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
#10Yeah I dunno about this, and the grafana service. They’re not exactly complicated to run on their own. At this pricing you may as well be on Datadog.