Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
rubyists.github.com
Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#2runit's a wonderful tool. Those interested in using it with ruby might want to take a look at the bunch of configurable runit services I use to reliably run several busy Rails sites: https://github.com/purcell/rails-runit
I also wrote an introduction to runit's process supervision scheme here: http://www.sanityinc.com/articles/init-scripts-considered-ha...
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#3Maybe the capitalization should be 'RunIt?' Talking about 'Runit' and Ruby makes me think that it's a unit testing framework...
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#4runit's a wonderful tool. Those interested in using it with ruby might want to take a look at the bunch of configurable runit services I use to reliably run several busy Rails sites: https://github.com/purcell/rails-runit I also wrote an introduction to runit's process supervision scheme here: http://www.sanityinc.com/articles/init-scripts-considered-ha...
Thanks for those links, it's good to see others using runit, I'm afraid because if its lack of popularity it's been overlooked as a sysv replacement in favor of systemd, upstart, and others. Runit's maturity should be a big edge, when thinking about a replacement PID 1.
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#5runit's a wonderful tool. Those interested in using it with ruby might want to take a look at the bunch of configurable runit services I use to reliably run several busy Rails sites: https://github.com/purcell/rails-runit I also wrote an introduction to runit's process supervision scheme here: http://www.sanityinc.com/articles/init-scripts-considered-ha...
Thanks for those links, it's good to see others using runit, I'm afraid because if its lack of popularity it's been overlooked as a sysv replacement in favor of systemd, upstart, and others. Runit's maturity should be a big edge, when thinking about a replacement PID 1.
Yes, it's a shame that the benchmarks didn't include Upstart, but of course that would be tricky to do on the Arch Linux distro they're using.
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for those links, it's good to see others using runit, I'm afraid because if its lack of popularity it's been overlooked as a sysv replacement in favor of systemd, upstart, and others. Runit's maturity should be a big edge, when thinking about a replacement PID 1.
Yes, it's a shame that the benchmarks didn't include Upstart, but of course that would be tricky to do on the Arch Linux distro they're using.
Problem is the only upstart distribution we tried (with the runit-run package in ubuntu) rendered the system unbootable. This seems to be the case with everything past Karmic.
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#7Maybe the capitalization should be 'RunIt?' Talking about 'Runit' and Ruby makes me think that it's a unit testing framework...
it shouldn't be capitalized at all, i think 'runit' is proper.
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it's a shame that the benchmarks didn't include Upstart, but of course that would be tricky to do on the Arch Linux distro they're using.
Problem is the only upstart distribution we tried (with the runit-run package in ubuntu) rendered the system unbootable. This seems to be the case with everything past Karmic.
have you filed this issue with the runit-run maintainer?
Re: Runit For Ruby And Everything Else
#9Cool name! Read it like run-it, and it just re-inforces the fact:D...