DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#2(Screenshot link in case it is promptly fixed: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/773927790248329286/78...))
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#3Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#4All I got was that reading Harry Potter gives you Ringworm?
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#5With suggestions as bad as that I might as well use Google.
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#6Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#7I see Harry Potter in the box, but even worse, WebMD is the #1 organic suggestion and Healthline #2. CDC is #4, Mayo Clinic #3 With suggestions as bad as that I might as well use Google.
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#8I see Harry Potter in the box, but even worse, WebMD is the #1 organic suggestion and Healthline #2. CDC is #4, Mayo Clinic #3 With suggestions as bad as that I might as well use Google.
What’s wrong with these results? Are not trustworthy?
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#9Although this in itself is a minor issue, it shows that you can't put your trust in these kinds of automatic fact aggregators. (Screenshot link in case it is promptly fixed: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/773927790248329286/78... ))
But yeah should be looked at!
Re: DuckDuckGo Cites Harry Potter Wiki as Explanation for Ringworm
#10I see Harry Potter in the box, but even worse, WebMD is the #1 organic suggestion and Healthline #2. CDC is #4, Mayo Clinic #3 With suggestions as bad as that I might as well use Google.
What’s wrong with these results? Are not trustworthy?
Mayo’s advice is not bad but I think the government (CDC) is better ground truth, especially for public health issues like ringworm.