Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#2This is a great book. Highly recommended if your are making decisions based on gathered information. Not just for spies. I'm coming back to that one regularly.
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#3In case it's not clear, the link is to one chapter in a larger book titled "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" by Richards J. Heuer, Jr.
The table of contents is here https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig...
A brief look at the table of contents suggest that the whole book is worth looking at.
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#4In case it's not clear, the link is to one chapter in a larger book titled "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" by Richards J. Heuer, Jr. The table of contents is here https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig... A brief look at the table of contents suggest that the whole book is worth looking at.
Also available as a pdf here:
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig...
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#5In case it's not clear, the link is to one chapter in a larger book titled "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" by Richards J. Heuer, Jr. The table of contents is here https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig... A brief look at the table of contents suggest that the whole book is worth looking at.
Also available as a pdf here: https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig...
This is the complete book?
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#6This seems like it would be an advantage if other people weren't aware of this information. I wonder why they decided to publish it publicly like this.
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#7That's very useful. This should be routinely taught in college, if not in high school.
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#8> The reaction of the Intelligence Community to many problems is to collect more information, even though analysts in many cases already have more information than they can digest. What analysts need is more truly useful information--mostly reliable HUMINT from knowledgeable insiders--to help them make good decisions. Or they need a more accurate mental model and better analytical tools to help them sort through, make sense of, and get the most out of the available ambiguous and conflicting information.
That seems to fit regular people and regular news these days. Too much "information"; not enough actual information; and too many biases.
Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#9Re: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (2007)
#10The book "Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis" by the same author is more recent and goes into details and applications.
They go over many biases and attentional phenomena, tools to prevent or mitigate, visualization techniques to address problems (timelines, etc.) with several examples.
It also goes into explaining the context that practitioners evolve in a context where information can be scarce, contradictory either by happenstance or by design by actors who want to confuse.
Here's a RAND report titled "Assessing the Value of Structured Analytic Techniques in the U.S. Intelligence Community".
- [0]: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/...