Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
1–10 of 415 posts
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#2Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#3Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/
That's faker than a 3 dollar bill. Many, many, of the "signatures" have been proven to be people that don't even exist.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/27/facebook-p...
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#4Seeing the fallout from Sturgis, I think the holiday seasons back-to-back are going to make things far worse. It doesn't help that we will already be in the middle of flu/common-cold season.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#5It also demonstrates why the "personal choice" stuff is BS here. I see a lot of folks going "why are you worried if you're following the rules yourself?", and yet...
> None of the victims who lost their lives had attended the party.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#6Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/
The only source I trust for my critical and unbiased coronavirus information is the "corona-research" user on Hacker News.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#7Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-...
> An open letter that made headlines calling for a herd immunity approach to Covid-19 lists a number of apparently fake names among its expert signatories, including “Dr Johnny Bananas” and “Professor Cominic Dummings”.
> Others listed include a resident at the “university of your mum” and another supposed specialist whose name was the first verse of the Macarena.
> Sky News discovered 18 self-declared homeopaths in the list of expert names and more than 100 therapists whose expertise included massage, hypnotherapy and Mongolian khoomii singing.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#8Thanksgiving is going to be one massive super spreading event, and I shudder to think about christmas.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#9"Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed."
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#10It also demonstrates why the "personal choice" stuff is BS here. I see a lot of folks going "why are you worried if you're following the rules yourself?", and yet... > None of the victims who lost their lives had attended the party.
Honestly, I would be okay with someone being tried for murder over this shit. Isn't the death penalty supposed to be a deterrence?