An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#2Trying to control someone's eye movements, or even just claiming you can understand the motivation behind someone's eye movements is completely draconian, awful, and wrong.
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#3I've seen this quite a bit during the pandemic, universities seem almost more concerned with exams than how to teach well in the current situation.
The amount of money being poured into tools to prevent cheating (which can be circumvented relatively easily) is astonishing.
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#4So many kids (and adults) already have terrible anxiety when it comes to test taking - and now these companies think that the best way to handle cheating is to have computers monitoring them every moment of an exam? I am glad I am no longer in school - this would make me five times more anxious and uncomfortable. Cheating is a problem, of course, but it’s a problem that really only affects the cheater. As long as an institution is making an honest effort to maintain academic integrity, that should be good enough. Tools like these seem extremely out of line.
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#5If someone can easily cheat on your exam by using a cheat sheet and get a good grade what value are you as an educator providing, really?
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#6If someone can easily cheat on your exam by using a cheat sheet and get a good grade what value are you as an educator providing, really?
So we can't safely assume it's possible - and reasonable to expect - to have exams which can't be cheated upon? Is it that hard to do?
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#7I've seen this quite a bit during the pandemic, universities seem almost more concerned with exams than how to teach well in the current situation. The amount of money being poured into tools to prevent cheating (which can be circumvented relatively easily) is astonishing.
Doesn't surprise me. They're in the certification business more than the education business.
Promising rigorous proctored tests gives their degrees more credibility than a self-awarded collection of MOOC course completions.
Re: An ed-tech specialist spoke out about proctoring software. Now he’s being sued
#8both case are awful... the software and the worker...
Is that futur?
U already fail hard before... and this wont solve any problem instead you'll have more & more...
You wont solve anything this way.
To me the real goal from this software isn't for the purpose...
The known purpose is a surface to another scheme they looking...
Have a nice day.