Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
1–10 of 95 posts
Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#2Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#3Previous HN discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1834671
ps: standing desk :)
Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#4Related article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39523298/ns/health-mens_health/ Previous HN discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1834671 ps: standing desk :)
Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#5Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#6Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#7I am not going to disagree with the article or dispute that sitting all day is not as healthy as occasionally moving around, but does anyone else feel like this is the latest "health scare" meme? It reminds me of how leg embolisms on long flights were the focus of attention a few years ago. (i.e. completely absent from the news at first, then an overabundance of stories once a single scientific study is published.)
Things that are good for us are bad in large amounts (vitamins), and things that are bad can be used for 'good' (botox).
Find what works for you, and makes you feel how you want, and stick with it. There will never be better advice since everyone is different. But where is the scare in that? :)
Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#8To that - with my hours cutback at work I now have a home office with a standing/sitting desk now, it's great.
Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#9Re: Sitting All Day: Worse For You Than You Might Think
#10I am not going to disagree with the article or dispute that sitting all day is not as healthy as occasionally moving around, but does anyone else feel like this is the latest "health scare" meme? It reminds me of how leg embolisms on long flights were the focus of attention a few years ago. (i.e. completely absent from the news at first, then an overabundance of stories once a single scientific study is published.)
No doubt it is. I think it's just a problem with us understanding more. There is always going to be, taking to much of something, too little of something else, doing to much of x, doing to little of x. Things that are good for us are bad in large amounts (vitamins), and things that are bad can be used for 'good' (botox). Find what works for you, and makes you feel how you want, and stick with it. There will never be…
However, all of these recent sitting news articles seem to be based on the same study. Perhaps the study is flawless, or perhaps the data collection was flawed, or the results can't be replicated, or something else went wrong. In that case, the news stories are prematurely trying to worry people into being into sitting less. I think being active is awesome, but it should be something you do because you enjoy it, or because you have weighed the pros and cons and decided it's worthwhile; it should not be something you do because you were misled about the the health risks.