Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#2Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#3This is tragic. Science must always be free of politics.
Trump actively harms science and scientists and universities, so why should the scientific community system quiet?
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#4This is tragic. Science must always be free of politics.
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#5This is tragic. Science must always be free of politics.
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#6https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published_Research_Fi...
So much about "truth".
People don't have a problem with science. They have a problem with scientists.
They also say how Trump is bad because of the Paris agreement for environment. Did you know that the Paris agreement has no legal bindings? It's just a PR move by politicians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement#Lack_of_bindin...
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#7This is tragic. Science must always be free of politics.
This is a hilariously naive way of seeing things. Science is never neutral and never can be, and pretending it is neutral is just saying you're fine with the current status quo. Trump actively harms science and scientists and universities, so why should the scientific community system quiet?
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a hilariously naive way of seeing things. Science is never neutral and never can be, and pretending it is neutral is just saying you're fine with the current status quo. Trump actively harms science and scientists and universities, so why should the scientific community system quiet?
Because it is incredibly divisive and cheapens the journal. I'm not interested in what my doctor thinks of Biden, I just want to get rid of the damn foot fungus.
Re: Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a hilariously naive way of seeing things. Science is never neutral and never can be, and pretending it is neutral is just saying you're fine with the current status quo. Trump actively harms science and scientists and universities, so why should the scientific community system quiet?
Because it is incredibly divisive and cheapens the journal. I'm not interested in what my doctor thinks of Biden, I just want to get rid of the damn foot fungus.
(FWIW, I think it would be amusing if Biden reached out to https://www.heavenmagazine.nl in order to get a Confucian mandate of heaven.)