Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
lowtechmagazine.com
Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
1–10 of 95 posts
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#2Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#3Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#4[1] http://www.u.arizona.edu/~deymier/deymier_group/refs/CAES.pd...
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#5For fixed-site applications of sufficient land area and scale, it's difficult to beat pumped-storage hydroelectricity (PSH). The round-trip efficiency is around or above 70%, the same or better than CAES. CAES is probably best used in applications similar to flywheel (FES), away from occupied areas.
My brother has a steep hill on his property and Ive been wondering about the feasibility of PSH. How high the tank should be, the equipment, the power output.
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#6Another cool energy storage technique is using subterranean flywheels. They'd probably require less maintenance than other similar energy storage mechanisms.
EMALS uses a big flywheel to power aircraft carrier catapults. The flywheel energy storage seems to cause most of the problems. The next generation of that system may use ultracapacitors.[1]
[1] https://www.ga.com/capacitors/military-mil-spec-capacitors
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#7For fixed-site applications of sufficient land area and scale, it's difficult to beat pumped-storage hydroelectricity (PSH). The round-trip efficiency is around or above 70%, the same or better than CAES. CAES is probably best used in applications similar to flywheel (FES), away from occupied areas.
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#8For fixed-site applications of sufficient land area and scale, it's difficult to beat pumped-storage hydroelectricity (PSH). The round-trip efficiency is around or above 70%, the same or better than CAES. CAES is probably best used in applications similar to flywheel (FES), away from occupied areas.
Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#9Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage (2018)
#10On a side note, I wonder what the state of research is on reducing the embodied energy in li-ion battery production. The mentioned figure in the article is surprisingly high (2-10 times the total energy the battery will store - presumably they mean over its lifetime), which now that I think aboute it, squares with what I have seen elsewhere on the embodied energy of electric car manufacture.