Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
hawaiigentech.com
Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
1–10 of 262 posts
Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#2The example provided in the article, showing how a site looked cleaner before, could simply be the content security policies at the WayBackMachine preventing the clutter from getting loaded, rather than any specific changes on the site - although I haven't checked that particular site.
Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#3Linking to Archive only makes Archive a single point of failure.
Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#4Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#5But how certain is the future of WayBackMachine, when disaster strikes, all your links are dead. On the other hand, the original links can still be read from the url, so the original reference is not completely gone.
Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#6Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#7Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#8Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#9The other day, I noticed that even old links from the front page of Google and Youtube are dead now. Internet Archive still has them. These were links on the front page of YT. Was very disappointed that even Google has dead links.
Re: Why I link to Wayback Machine instead of original web content
#10Bookmark Location- https://web.archive.org/save/%s
Keyword - save
So searching 'save https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24406193' archives this post.
You can use any Keyword instead of 'save'.
You can also search with https://web.archive.org/*/%s