MongoDB History
quickprogrammingtips.com
MongoDB History
1–10 of 74 posts
Re: MongoDB History
#2A detailed and interesting history of MongoDB database.
Re: MongoDB History
#3A pretty solid history. Kinda skipped over the launch of MongoDB Atlas, but this is the only miss in a pretty accurate account.
Re: MongoDB History
#4A complete history with all the data ... unlike MongoDB. Boom tish etc.
Re: MongoDB History
#5Lots of interesting info, and I really like working with MongoDB. But I am baffled by the claim that "MongoDB is the king." In all the circles I work in, I only hear Mongo dismissed as a joke. Unfortunately the company's dismissiveness of RDBMSes, their hubris in pushing NoSQL, and their blunders over what are extremely poor default settings all combine to make MongoDB something I don't see anyone taking seriously. I use it in a project where it's basically just serving as a big cache, so the reliability and durability of the data is not critical. It's certainly way easier to query than any other document-oriented database, but getting a foothold to use for anything requiring long-term storage would be a major challenge.
Re: MongoDB History
#6Hugh mongo... Sorry wrong website
Re: MongoDB History
#7Lots of interesting info, and I really like working with MongoDB. But I am baffled by the claim that "MongoDB is the king." In all the circles I work in, I only hear Mongo dismissed as a joke. Unfortunately the company's dismissiveness of RDBMSes, their hubris in pushing NoSQL, and their blunders over what are extremely poor default settings all combine to make MongoDB something I don't see anyone taking seriously. I…
I am biased but you are definitely missing out by just listening to your friends on this one. These days MongoDB is pretty mature and the “MongoDB sucks” meme is getting pretty long in the tooth.
It turns out it takes a decade to build a new database that’s half decent and has all the features people want. It’s really hard! Ask anyone that’s tried. The path is littered with skeletons.
Of course, there are those databases that are “perfect” from the start and never made any mistakes but is anyone talking about them today? Even Postgres gets it wrong sometimes.
Re: MongoDB History
#8The "Mongo DB is Web Scale" video just turned 10 years old. I'm pretty sure that was a big factor in MongoDB not being taken seriously by many people.
Re: MongoDB History
#9Lots of interesting info, and I really like working with MongoDB. But I am baffled by the claim that "MongoDB is the king." In all the circles I work in, I only hear Mongo dismissed as a joke. Unfortunately the company's dismissiveness of RDBMSes, their hubris in pushing NoSQL, and their blunders over what are extremely poor default settings all combine to make MongoDB something I don't see anyone taking seriously. I…
I am biased but you are definitely missing out by just listening to your friends on this one. These days MongoDB is pretty mature and the “MongoDB sucks” meme is getting pretty long in the tooth. It turns out it takes a decade to build a new database that’s half decent and has all the features people want. It’s really hard! Ask anyone that’s tried. The path is littered with skeletons. Of course, there are those datab…
> Even Postgres gets it wrong sometimes
Imagining a timeline where people would say that about MongoDB is a good way to assess the project's quality...
Re: MongoDB History
#10A complete history with all the data ... unlike MongoDB. Boom tish etc.
I never got a definite answer: What problem does MongoDB even try to solve?