Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
blog.optimizely.com
Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
#2Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24365479, which was posted earlier and points to a third party article rather than a corporate press release.
Corporate press releases are mostly an exemption from HN's original-source rule (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) because they are mostly evasive, unreadable mush. In this case the third-party article says almost nothing, but at least it's readable.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
Re: Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
#3[deleted]
Re: Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
#4Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24365479 , which was posted earlier and points to a third party article rather than a corporate press release. Corporate press releases are mostly an exemption from HN's original-source rule ( https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html ) because they are mostly evasive, unreadable mush. In this case the third-party article says almost nothing, but at least…
@dang, this is a great policy and should be incorporated explicitly into the guidelines, IMO. I would also suggest applying this to scientific articles, given how fluffy university press releases can be, as well.
Re: Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
#5[deleted]
Re: Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
#6Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24365479 , which was posted earlier and points to a third party article rather than a corporate press release. Corporate press releases are mostly an exemption from HN's original-source rule ( https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html ) because they are mostly evasive, unreadable mush. In this case the third-party article says almost nothing, but at least…
@dang, this is a great policy and should be incorporated explicitly into the guidelines, IMO. I would also suggest applying this to scientific articles, given how fluffy university press releases can be, as well.
University press releases tend to be better, although they're clearly promotional. The trouble with most scientific papers is that they're highly specialized and, depending on the field, hard for outsiders to read. In those cases we usually recommend submitting the best third-party article and linking to the paper from the comments.
A similar category is legal rulings, which came up yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24357078