Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#2Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#3Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#4The article in question has a single external reference: a page on the CommonJS wiki which basically just says that NodeJS exists. Add some real citations to the article and the issue goes away.
Edit: Some anonymous user removed the notice. Here's the old version of the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Node.js&oldid=...
Also, notice the sentences "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason" and "If this template is removed, it should not be replaced." in the original warning.
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#5The culprit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mootros
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#6The culprit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mootros
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#7The culprit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mootros
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#8Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#9The culprit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mootros
[deleted]
"And decided that said heavily-trafficked articles should be deleted as being unnotable, instead of asking for more citations."
Sure.
Re: Node.js wikipedia entry marked for deletion for not being notable
#10And there was the first time I've ever tried to edit a Wikipedia page.