Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
money.cnn.com
Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#2I'm curious: why the editorializing in the title of this submission? It seems to me the original CNN title is perfectly sound.
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#3I'm curious: why the editorializing in the title of this submission? It seems to me the original CNN title is perfectly sound.
The font can be hard to read, but I think it's Winklevii, even though it looks like Winklevil. At least the OP took the word 'zombie' out of the original title.
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#4Call me an old dude (which I am), but can we please not make fun of people's names? The joke is funny, I laughed, but it is not good to do this in a public place like HN.
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#5I'm curious: why the editorializing in the title of this submission? It seems to me the original CNN title is perfectly sound.
"Winklevii" did appear in the CNN article. Judging from a quick Google search it's been used before (42,000 results)
http://www.google.com/search?q=winklevii
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#6Call me an old dude (which I am), but can we please not make fun of people's names? The joke is funny, I laughed, but it is not good to do this in a public place like HN.
Also, if you want to do it right, use a dual form for expressing a pair, -o. One Winkelvos, two Winkelvo, a family of Winkelvi.
Duals are used for pairs or things, like eyes or hands, in Latin and Ancient Greek. In Sanskrit, duals are even more common. (Respect your elders, learn some outmoded grammar today!)
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#7Call me an old dude (which I am), but can we please not make fun of people's names? The joke is funny, I laughed, but it is not good to do this in a public place like HN.
From the article "Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss (a.k.a. "the Winklevii")"
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#8Call me an old dude (which I am), but can we please not make fun of people's names? The joke is funny, I laughed, but it is not good to do this in a public place like HN.
Also, if you want to do it right, use a dual form for expressing a pair, -o. One Winkelvos, two Winkelvo, a family of Winkelvi. Duals are used for pairs or things, like eyes or hands, in Latin and Ancient Greek. In Sanskrit, duals are even more common. (Respect your elders, learn some outmoded grammar today!)
I don't remember anything about pairs being a special case in Latin (At least roman style Latin, not catholic style Latin), even in the 3rd declension nouns (which are the ones that pluralize via -i).
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#9Call me an old dude (which I am), but can we please not make fun of people's names? The joke is funny, I laughed, but it is not good to do this in a public place like HN.
[deleted]
Re: Winklevii Facebook appeal rejected
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, if you want to do it right, use a dual form for expressing a pair, -o. One Winkelvos, two Winkelvo, a family of Winkelvi. Duals are used for pairs or things, like eyes or hands, in Latin and Ancient Greek. In Sanskrit, duals are even more common. (Respect your elders, learn some outmoded grammar today!)
I don't remember anything about pairs being a special case in Latin (At least roman style Latin, not catholic style Latin), even in the 3rd declension nouns (which are the ones that pluralize via -i).
As far as I recall, it's mostly duo, ambo, and 2nd declension nouns by analogy in archaizing poetic passages.