Live data from Hacker News

The Jellyfish Problem

historytoday.com

1–10 of 12 posts

Re: The Jellyfish Problem

#2
We still have the problem of the ctenophores. "Comb jellies", they used to be, until it turned out they have practically nothing in common with jellyfish except transparency and radial symmetry. Or with anything else.

They use proteins similar to those used by other animals, but for different things. Some people think they evolved muscles and nerves entirely independently of other animals. Some people think they fell from the sky.

Whatever you think, they are astonishing in every detail. Watch videos of Beroe if you have any doubts.

Re: The Jellyfish Problem

#5
post #2

We still have the problem of the ctenophores. "Comb jellies", they used to be, until it turned out they have practically nothing in common with jellyfish except transparency and radial symmetry. Or with anything else. They use proteins similar to those used by other animals, but for different things. Some people think they evolved muscles and nerves entirely independently of other animals. Some people think they fell…

Fascinating! Thank you for sharing. They really do look like alien creatures.

Re: The Jellyfish Problem

#8

There is no 'true' category for anything. The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/21/the-categories-were-ma...

> Thus Abraham Lincoln’s famous riddle: “If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?” And the answer: “Four – because a tail isn’t a leg regardless of what you call it.”

Enter the kangaroo.

Re: The Jellyfish Problem

#10
post #7

The article didn’t mention phylogenetic analysis of jellyfish genes or genomes, e.g. using 16S rRNA. [1] [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16S_ribosomal_RNA A brief search didn’t yield anything on jellyfish phylogeny for me, would be curious if anyone else has information on this.

Use "cnidaria" as your keyword?

https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/fsts/media/DNAbarcodingCnidar...

Post reply on HN