Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
science.sciencemag.org
Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#2Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#3Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#4Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#5When will the B3LYP paper come out?
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#6Please skip Shor's algorithm, I understand this part. What else is there?
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#7I cannot find the answer to this anywhere: what algorithms will we actually use the quantum computers for? Please skip Shor's algorithm, I understand this part. What else is there?
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#8I cannot find the answer to this anywhere: what algorithms will we actually use the quantum computers for? Please skip Shor's algorithm, I understand this part. What else is there?
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#9I cannot find the answer to this anywhere: what algorithms will we actually use the quantum computers for? Please skip Shor's algorithm, I understand this part. What else is there?
There is also Grover's search algorithm, which can retrieve items from an N-element list with fewer than N operations.
In the quantum chemistry world, there is work underway to build QC circuits that act as models for natural systems, "natively" capturing the exchange and correlation structure. I've seen model Hamiltonians for small molecules, and this work seems to be in that family also.
There are also folks who can do linear algebra on sufficiently sparse, well-conditioned matrices[1].
From what I have read, quantum computers really are very different, a good way to think about them is as super-efficient correlation-finding or correlation-generating machines. Asking "What Von Nuemann algorithm can I put on this?" is the wrong question.
If you can devise a correlation solution to your problem, then a quantum computer will be a good tool for you.
To re-disclaim, I am not an expert, I'm a reasonably technical interested bystander. For me, the "Oh, I get it!" book was Yanofsky, "Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists".
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_algorithm_for_linear_s...
Re: Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
#10I cannot find the answer to this anywhere: what algorithms will we actually use the quantum computers for? Please skip Shor's algorithm, I understand this part. What else is there?