Live data from Hacker News

Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

howtogeek.com

1–10 of 262 posts

Re: Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

#2
Las week I brougth an old G4 the poped up in the marked. A rare thing to occour here, since they where super expensive when new.

I paid something like 20 bucks for it. It came with a busted ide hard drive, but no worries. I went online and brought an ide to sd card adapter, and will now install Tiger in it.

I don't spect to take any serious workload, but It will problably be fine to run Starcraft and Diablo II in it. Will see.

Re: Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

#4
I'm not trying to be a downer, but there is absolutely no reason to do this. For $50 you can do so much better without really trying all that hard.

Now I fully appreciate the draw of doing something like this as a hobby or something, but this article is talking about productivity. This is not an investment for productivity.

Re: Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

#7
For approximately 10x as much ($500 USD), you can get a pre-retina Air, which has a much improved keyboard, working wifi, flash storage, and a modern OS and browser. It also happens to be way lighter.

To me that’s more than a 10x improvement over the setup the author describes. There’s relatively little you can’t do on such a $500 machine.

Re: Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

#9
post #2

Las week I brougth an old G4 the poped up in the marked. A rare thing to occour here, since they where super expensive when new. I paid something like 20 bucks for it. It came with a busted ide hard drive, but no worries. I went online and brought an ide to sd card adapter, and will now install Tiger in it. I don't spect to take any serious workload, but It will problably be fine to run Starcraft and Diablo II in it.…

You'd be better off with a CF to IDE adapter. SD really isn't well suited to be a main OS volume. Or just get a SATA to IDE adapter.

Re: Why I still use an old PowerPC Mac

#10
post #5

Maybe it's just me, but the user interface on that old PowerPC Mac looks gorgeous - way better than modern "flat" UIs

I find flat more aesthetically pleasing but often harder to use, and I've seen data to back that up.

Problem is that people tend to confuse the two and fool themselves into thinking pretty equals usable. Glossy vs matte screens are the classic example. Glossy looks pretty but has way more issues with glare.

Post reply on HN