Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
nicolodavis.com
Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
1–10 of 428 posts
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#2Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#3I don’t know Rust and haven’t done JavaScript for years but isn’t JavaScript a bit more of a higher level language, which would make a developer more productive? Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#4I don’t know Rust and haven’t done JavaScript for years but isn’t JavaScript a bit more of a higher level language, which would make a developer more productive? Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#5I don’t know Rust and haven’t done JavaScript for years but isn’t JavaScript a bit more of a higher level language, which would make a developer more productive? Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Depends on what you're optimizing for. If you want memory efficiency and near-native speeds, then you need WebAssembly. And Rust is a fantastic source language to compile to WebAssembly because of its memory safety.
Asking out of ignorance!
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#6I don’t know Rust and haven’t done JavaScript for years but isn’t JavaScript a bit more of a higher level language, which would make a developer more productive? Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#7Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#8I don’t know Rust and haven’t done JavaScript for years but isn’t JavaScript a bit more of a higher level language, which would make a developer more productive? Rust being closer to the hardware should require more code, and effort, to accomplish the same task.
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on what you're optimizing for. If you want memory efficiency and near-native speeds, then you need WebAssembly. And Rust is a fantastic source language to compile to WebAssembly because of its memory safety.
Mind explaining a bit more here why Rust is a particularly good language to compile to wasm? Why does memory safety help here? Asking out of ignorance!
Re: Moving from TypeScript to Rust / WebAssembly
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on what you're optimizing for. If you want memory efficiency and near-native speeds, then you need WebAssembly. And Rust is a fantastic source language to compile to WebAssembly because of its memory safety.
Mind explaining a bit more here why Rust is a particularly good language to compile to wasm? Why does memory safety help here? Asking out of ignorance!