Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#2I think you will spend more on electricity than a cheap VPS at Scaleway, OVH (kimsufi), or Hetzner.
Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#3Been running many enterprise applications in-house. in-office on variety internet providers from 10/10 to 100/100.
Your connectivity is superior.
Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#4Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#5Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#6Digital Ocean is like $5 a month. If that's too much money for you, then hosting at home is probably your best option. Downside is that you're going to spend all your time figuring out how to manage your own server.
Re: Ask HN: Self-hosting websites? Good or bad idea?
#7Digital Ocean is like $5 a month. If that's too much money for you, then hosting at home is probably your best option. Downside is that you're going to spend all your time figuring out how to manage your own server.
And even cheaper is Amazon Lightsail starting at $3.50/mo, pretty hard to beat. I think for the amount of time spent managing a server and DNS things at home, these options may be more desirable.
3.5$ for 512mb of ram and 1 slow vcpu is not competitive at all.