Live data from Hacker News

Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in libreboot? (2017)

libreboot.org

1–10 of 132 posts

Re: Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in libreboot? (2017)

#5
> Traffic is encrypted using SSL/TLS libraries, but recall that all of the major SSL/TLS implementations have had highly publicized vulnerabilities.

I'm not sure this is a valid criticism...wouldn't we be more worried if they were using anything else instead?

Re: Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in libreboot? (2017)

#8
post #5

> Traffic is encrypted using SSL/TLS libraries, but recall that all of the major SSL/TLS implementations have had highly publicized vulnerabilities. I'm not sure this is a valid criticism...wouldn't we be more worried if they were using anything else instead?

Not if the "anything else" was for this part of the system to not exist and/or not have any network access.

Re: Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in libreboot? (2017)

#9
post #3

By now, it's probably reasonable to assume that NSA, GCHQ, the FSB, the Third Department, and Mossad can all use that backdoor.

It's probably reasonable to assume that half the attendees at DEFCON can use that backdoor. There are several known vulnerabilities listed in the linked Wikipedia article which have to be patched with a firmware update that some OEMs didn't bother to provide and most users didn't bother to install.

Re: Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in libreboot? (2017)

#10
Asking someone who took their last (undergraduate) architecture course more than a decade ago: Is it possible to design a motherboard that will shield the user against Intel ME / AMD PSP-induced shadiness? Would it be possible to do this without performance impact?
Post reply on HN