Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
#2It seems straight forward to interpret (which means I'm probably wrong.) Since the motions are impossible they didn't happen. Either:
1) The objects were much closer and the high speed motions were apparent motions; or 2) The instruments were being spoofed by: A) DARPA experiments; B) The Chinese; C) The Russians; or D) Some other party (Israelis or ?
Re: Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
#3It seems straight forward to interpret (which means I'm probably wrong.) Since the motions are impossible they didn't happen. Either: 1) The objects were much closer and the high speed motions were apparent motions; or 2) The instruments were being spoofed by: A) DARPA experiments; B) The Chinese; C) The Russians; or D) Some other party (Israelis or ?
Nothing impossible about those motions, any sufficiently advanced technology looks like magic.
Re: Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
#4Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21858093
(I know there were more, but can’t find them atm.)
Re: Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
#5Some form of advanced drone or interceptor created by the US, combined with a disinformation campaign.
Re: Since the UFO footage is mainstream, lets see what our best theories are
#6Some form of advanced drone or interceptor created by the US, combined with a disinformation campaign.
I thought the general consensus was that the way that the craft was accelerating far outpaced any known tech by a large margin. I was hoping some aeronautics HNers could chime in with their 2 cents.