Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#2https://www.nybloodcenter.org/donate-blood/convalescent-plas...
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#3Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#4Is this how we get zombies? Would be a pretty neat way to see the world end.
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#5Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#6I read this last night: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3078840/coro... It's not peer reviewed so might not be valid or entirely accurate but worrying nevertheless.
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#7I read this last night: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3078840/coro... It's not peer reviewed so might not be valid or entirely accurate but worrying nevertheless.
Yes, it was already mentioned today in the update to parliament here. Apparently - as with other respiratory viral infections - if you don't get it really bad then you may not be immune. That's a pretty fine line there. This would explain some of the more puzzling positive / negative / positive test sequences.
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#8They're currently working to establish antibody testing, and require potential donors to be at least 14 days from end of symptoms, but they will still accept your contact information and relevant details for later contact.
Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#9Re: Promising Covid-19 treatment using convalescent serum therapy fast-tracked
#10I read this last night: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3078840/coro... It's not peer reviewed so might not be valid or entirely accurate but worrying nevertheless.
Yes, it was already mentioned today in the update to parliament here. Apparently - as with other respiratory viral infections - if you don't get it really bad then you may not be immune. That's a pretty fine line there. This would explain some of the more puzzling positive / negative / positive test sequences.
Source?