A practical guide to writing technical specs
stackoverflow.blog
A practical guide to writing technical specs
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#2Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#3This endless lost of spec sections sounds a lot like waterfall. It's a formula for a gigantic document that one person writes and nobody ever reads. And when they do, the real world has already caused half of it to be outdated.
Is it just me or does a reasonable concern for documentation over time ossify into rent-seeking by corporate moochers?
Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#4This endless lost of spec sections sounds a lot like waterfall. It's a formula for a gigantic document that one person writes and nobody ever reads. And when they do, the real world has already caused half of it to be outdated.
Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#5This endless lost of spec sections sounds a lot like waterfall. It's a formula for a gigantic document that one person writes and nobody ever reads. And when they do, the real world has already caused half of it to be outdated.
1. Describing the problem, the business value, and the key words/definitions
2. Defining the goals _and non-goals_ for the project
3. Describing the implementation's logic and data model (a simple schema with boxes and arrows)
I like how it is done in "Domain Modeling Made Functional". However I agree too much of this is counterproductive.
Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#6Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#7You don't know 80% of this stuff before you start.
Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#8Re: A practical guide to writing technical specs
#9The spec itself is not so important but the process of creating it. Because all stakeholders are forced to think through the problem and the implementation beforehand, come to an agreement and are on the same information level before starting.
- Eisenhower