Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#2Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#3Reads like the author is one of these spammers...
"If Linkedin would just block people from sending hundreds of connection requests, firms would vett their recruiters better, and candidates would ignore messages from strangers, then spam would decrease."
Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#4Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#5Why do you think it is rational for a hiring firm, to not care about the job description? Wouldn't it be better for them, if only people with the necessary background applied? Then the number of interviews might go down, but the rate of hiring/interview would probably go up, so they would save time and money?
Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#6Reads like the author is one of these spammers...
I took your feedback to heart that I don't offer a solution. So, I added this paragraph that suggests one: "If Linkedin would just block people from sending hundreds of connection requests, firms would vett their recruiters better, and candidates would ignore messages from strangers, then spam would decrease."
Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#7I recently did a phone interview for a company that was looking for an "iOS Guy." Then during the screen, they told me they were actually looking for an embedded C++ developer.
And that's just if everyone is well-meaning but lazy/incompetent. Add to that scam companies like Cybercoders and all of India, which has a 6-month contract for me 3000 miles from my home, and you've got a real mess.
Re: Why recruiter spam works and why you might as well stop complaining
#8Why do you think it is rational for a hiring firm, to not care about the job description? Wouldn't it be better for them, if only people with the necessary background applied? Then the number of interviews might go down, but the rate of hiring/interview would probably go up, so they would save time and money?