Live data from Hacker News

What is energy, actually? (2011)

jancovici.com

1–10 of 286 posts

Re: What is energy, actually? (2011)

#5
post #3

I calculated that I use 3000kwh per year (only direct electricity+gas) If everyone use such amounts there were no global warming. But humans always have not enough stuff...

Do you have an idea of your share of the embodied energy of all the items you use in the course of your life?

Re: What is energy, actually? (2011)

#6
post #4

Give up population growth. This really is key but too often overlooked.

Population growth is slowing, and population is predicted to flatten out. So yay!

That falls very short of what should be done to limit our impact on the planet for the sake of protecting the environment and remaining wilderness.

I really don't understand this disconnect between the message of urgency about the environment and the climate, and the widespread complacency about an actual root cause of the issue (as illustrated by your comment), which is population growth: "Oh it's slowing and will probably stabilise at 11 billions... that's fine. On the other hand, we must be emissions-neutral and stop using plastics by tomorrow." That's totally incoherent.

Re: What is energy, actually? (2011)

#8
post #3

I calculated that I use 3000kwh per year (only direct electricity+gas) If everyone use such amounts there were no global warming. But humans always have not enough stuff...

You don't use any products or services that require energy to function?

Re: What is energy, actually? (2011)

#9
Somewhat tangentially related: I wrote this in a private note to a friend last year. I don't believe this 100%, but the idea is worth exploring in my opinion:

1. Corporations desperately pursue continuous growth, even when they're already profitable, and do so at the expense of the environment, employee welfare and sometimes, the rule of law.

2. Corporations pursue growth because investors demand it.

3. Investors demand growth because they want a certain minimum return on investment.

4. Investors need to invest money in instruments with a certain minimum ROI because if they don't, inflation will erode their savings.

5. This continuous growth requirement forces companies to compete for larger and larger portions of market share, which in turn forces their competitors to compete harder in response.

6. The end result is a sort of "Red Queen" effect where everyone is forced to compete harder and harder just to maintain his/her existing standard of living.

7. We know that the more extreme a competition becomes, the more ruthless the participants become, often to the point of acting immorally.

8. Therefore, we should focus on curbing inflation to curb the pace of overwhelming growth, and thereby restore some measure of social justice.

Re: What is energy, actually? (2011)

#10
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Population growth is slowing, and population is predicted to flatten out. So yay!

That falls very short of what should be done to limit our impact on the planet for the sake of protecting the environment and remaining wilderness. I really don't understand this disconnect between the message of urgency about the environment and the climate, and the widespread complacency about an actual root cause of the issue (as illustrated by your comment), which is population growth: " Oh it's slowing and will…

Most of the world is empty: https://geoawesomeness.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/world-...

We just need to learn to be efficient.

Post reply on HN