Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#2Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#3Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#4The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless.
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#5If you knew someone was getting paid to open PRs on projects they normally wouldn’t, why would you keep following them? The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless.
It's a joke
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#6If you knew someone was getting paid to open PRs on projects they normally wouldn’t, why would you keep following them? The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless.
> The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless. It's a joke
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#7If you knew someone was getting paid to open PRs on projects they normally wouldn’t, why would you keep following them? The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless.
> The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless. It's a joke
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless. It's a joke
Is it? The reply seems to nail it down.
Re: Ask HN: Are we really getting into the “GitFluencers” era?
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The guy complaining that he “sent this in confidence” thereby outing himself is priceless. It's a joke
It certainly is, but not an intentional one