Fedora 31 is officially here
fedoramagazine.org
Fedora 31 is officially here
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#2> Stay tuned for a planned contest to find a shiny name for the IoT edition!
Throwing a vote in for Fedora Feather
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#3I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable.
I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#4I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable. I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
I've used just about all of the "hypervisors" at one point or another. If this is all new to you, I'd suggest perhaps starting with Proxmox VE [0]. That'll give you a decent (web) GUI to use to manage everything. Once you understand how things work and have some familiarity with the concepts, then you can start looking at other hypervisors if you decide you want something different.
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#5I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable. I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
I use Fedora Server for exactly that. It comes with Cockpit [0] out of the box, which I find to be a great management interface.
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#6I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable. I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
I use Fedora Server for exactly that. It comes with Cockpit [0] out of the box, which I find to be a great management interface. [0] https://cockpit-project.org/
I've never heard of Cockpit before. It is a lightweight, secure CPanel alternative?
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use Fedora Server for exactly that. It comes with Cockpit [0] out of the box, which I find to be a great management interface. [0] https://cockpit-project.org/
I've never heard of Cockpit before. It is a lightweight, secure CPanel alternative?
It's closer to CPanel's WebHost Manager product (aimed at hosting providers/machine admins) than the customer-facing CPanel.
You login with your usual Linux user account and can do things like network and storage configuration, get CPU usage statistics, start/stop containers and VMs, that sort of stuff. Nothing you couldn't do via SSH, but presented in a straightforward UI.
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use Fedora Server for exactly that. It comes with Cockpit [0] out of the box, which I find to be a great management interface. [0] https://cockpit-project.org/
I've never heard of Cockpit before. It is a lightweight, secure CPanel alternative?
I just installed it to check it out. Nowhere near as "feature complete" as CPanel, but it looks like a good lightweight status monitoring dashboard. Allows some minimal configuration changes and provides a decent HTML5 console implementation.
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#9I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable. I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
Consider using toolbox[0][1], a tool built by and for Fedora (especially Fedora Silverblue and CoreOS).
Essentially, you enter an unprivileged container (no root, no daemon), but keep your username and home directory. What this means is you can switch operating systems but keep your environment and kernel.
I enter toolbox to build packages using build-time dependencies from Fedora Rawhide. Outside toolbox, my packages get updated as well.
As of 2019-10-30, only Fedora-based images have been officially created; however, others have made functioning PRs for Ubuntu and CentOS-based toolboxes.
Your containers can be saved to a special location that gets backed up. I back up mine with rclone[2] to my school's unlimited Google Drive storage.
[0]: https://github.com/containers/toolbox
[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/toolb...
[2]: https://rclone.org/
Re: Fedora 31 is officially here
#10I'm building a home server in a week or two to replace all my single board computers. Instead of running one system I want to do it in VMs to help me keep them separates and easily backupable. I have very little experience with that, and I just want to ask whether fedora silverblue would be the distro for me? Does anyone have any experience?
Consider using toolbox[0][1], a tool built by and for Fedora (especially Fedora Silverblue and CoreOS). Essentially, you enter an unprivileged container (no root, no daemon), but keep your username and home directory. What this means is you can switch operating systems but keep your environment and kernel. I enter toolbox to build packages using build-time dependencies from Fedora Rawhide. Outside toolbox, my package…
I think I will go with fedora server, since this will double as my desktop system from time to time, and for that I use a lot of Guix stuff. Using Guix on silverblue seems like asking for trouble...