Live data from Hacker News

Cryptography: why modes matter, and why 'encrypted' is not always 'unreadable'

Post reply on HN

Print view View original

1–3 of 3 posts

Cryptography: why modes matter, and why 'encrypted' is not always 'unreadable'

#1

Post by daveio » Sun, Jan 23, 2011, 7:55 PM UTC

Cryptography: why modes matter, and why 'encrypted' is not always 'unreadable'
geekosaur.com

Re: Cryptography: why modes matter, and why 'encrypted' is not always 'unreadable'

#2

Post by bhickey » Sun, Jan 23, 2011, 8:14 PM UTC

You should give proper attribution for your images.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tux.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tux_ecb.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tux_secure.jpg

Re: Cryptography: why modes matter, and why 'encrypted' is not always 'unreadable'

#3

Post by daveio » Sun, Jan 23, 2011, 8:32 PM UTC

Fair point, attributions modified.

Post reply on HN