Live data from Hacker News

LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

blogs.wsj.com

1–10 of 27 posts

Re: LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

#3
post #2

What bubble?

I don't see why everyone's so skeptical of this.

How is this any different than other social sites? Basically what they're doing is crowd sourcing humor and that seems like a better plan than a lot of other startups I've seen.

Give the huge audience potential (who doesn't like a good laugh?) and their proven record of success (3 years) it doesn't seem like a terrible investment to me.

Re: LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

#7
post #3
post #2

What bubble?

I don't see why everyone's so skeptical of this. How is this any different than other social sites? Basically what they're doing is crowd sourcing humor and that seems like a better plan than a lot of other startups I've seen. Give the huge audience potential (who doesn't like a good laugh?) and their proven record of success (3 years) it doesn't seem like a terrible investment to me.

Some of us will never be able to really accept the idea that $30m isn't a metric shitload of money, for anything, let alone a faddish humour website.

Whenever I see these numbers I can't help but think about how much food you can buy for $30m. I know economics is obviously more complex than that, building wealth helps the world etc. but I still find it impossible to get over this. Just being honest.

Re: LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

#8
post #2

What bubble?

Ah, the classic "Holier than thou" attitude of some technical people. 375 million pageviews a month, between ads and merchandise sales I'd be really surprised if they make anything less than 7 figures a month in revenue. Hate the company if you wish, but investing in them is far from an indicator of a bubble, in my opinion.

Re: LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

#9
post #2

What bubble?

But they're already profitable and have a proven business model (gain attention, sell it to advertisers). I have serious doubts about their ability to make good use of $30MM, but I don't think it's vaporware, either. This could be a case of smart founders taking liquidity in an era of cheap money.

Re: LOLCats... Yes, you can haz $30m

#10
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see why everyone's so skeptical of this. How is this any different than other social sites? Basically what they're doing is crowd sourcing humor and that seems like a better plan than a lot of other startups I've seen. Give the huge audience potential (who doesn't like a good laugh?) and their proven record of success (3 years) it doesn't seem like a terrible investment to me.

Some of us will never be able to really accept the idea that $30m isn't a metric shitload of money, for anything, let alone a faddish humour website. Whenever I see these numbers I can't help but think about how much food you can buy for $30m. I know economics is obviously more complex than that, building wealth helps the world etc. but I still find it impossible to get over this. Just being honest.

It's true that lolcats could be viewed as "faddish", but if so, it's a very long-lived and popular fad.

Guess what a long-lived and popular fad is? A gold mine, at least for a while...

Post reply on HN