Live data from Hacker News

Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

dearstackexchange.com

1–10 of 444 posts

Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

#2
Via https://dandelion.eu/semantic-text/entity-extraction-demo/ run on dearstackexchange.com:

Stack Exchange Abstract: Stack Exchange is a network of question-and-answer websites on topics in varied fields, each site covering a specific topic, where questions, answers, and users are subject to a reputation award process. The sites are modeled after Stack Overflow, a Q&A site for computer programming questions that was the original site in this network. The reputation system allows the sites to be self-moderating. As of April 2017, the three most popular sites in the network are: Stack Overflow, Super User and Ask Ubuntu. User contributions are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 ...

Spot:Stack Exchange network Accuracy: Categories:Computing websites, Internet properties established in 2008, Software developer communities, Companies based in New York City, Stack Exchange network... Types:Website, Work Policy

TOP ENTITY Communication Spamming Lawsuit Twitter Due process Human rights Judgement Code of conduct Goal Human Touch (Bruce Springsteen song) News media Extremism Prejudice Search report Family Suffering

TOP ENTITY Social exclusion Mass media Stack Overflow Social network

TOP ENTITY Trust (emotion) Activism Social group Good Times Value (ethics) Theory Sympathy Accountability Autonomy Understanding Emotion Action (philosophy) Feedback

TOP ENTITY Word Social relation

Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

#7
I would love a nice couple paragraphs that said "here's what happened", otherwise taking any side in this is just taking shots in the dark, I'm basically reading "certain events happened with a certain individual and that's not okay"

Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

#8
> We are disappointed with the lack of responsiveness to community concerns. On Meta Stack Exchange, bug reports, feature and support requests go unacknowledged, sometimes for months or years, and some excellent posts never receive a staff response. Meanwhile, there have been cases when staff have responded to complaints on Twitter almost immediately, taking action without due process and without consulting with the impacted sites.

It’s sad that more and more companies ignore normal support channels (a very well established and proven one in SE’s case) and only answer to Twitter shaming. For one thing, it’s very unfair to those of us who don’t (otherwise) use Twitter — I have to keep an account just for tech support, and even then I highly doubt my requests are valued as much as ones from accounts with 10k or more followers.

Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

#9
It's terribly sad that StackExchange is less likely to respond to a well-reasoned argument by informed and invested moderators like this than a pack of idiots on Twitter hooting for blood. Cancel-culture is cancer.

Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.

#10

I would love a nice couple paragraphs that said "here's what happened", otherwise taking any side in this is just taking shots in the dark, I'm basically reading "certain events happened with a certain individual and that's not okay"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21173643
Post reply on HN