Live data from Hacker News

The myth of the teacher pay gap?

nationalaffairs.com

1–10 of 308 posts

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#3

One of my relatives retired from teaching a couple of years ago. She had guaranteed raises every year and ended up making close to $100,000/year.

And that's with a 3 month break every year. But still, dealing with kids every day is hard work. I know I wouldn't want to do it as a career. I thank those that do.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#4

One of my relatives retired from teaching a couple of years ago. She had guaranteed raises every year and ended up making close to $100,000/year.

And that's with a 3 month break every year. But still, dealing with kids every day is hard work. I know I wouldn't want to do it as a career. I thank those that do.

On the east and west coast, I've met quite a few teachers, and none have a 3 month break every year. Maybe a few weeks, but they are frequently tasked with continuing education or some other task during the summers. And during the year, they're always working 12+ hour days.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#5

One of my relatives retired from teaching a couple of years ago. She had guaranteed raises every year and ended up making close to $100,000/year.

Good for her! Unfortunately, your anecdote is not representative. Many older teachers are getting forced out because, well, they're expensive and new teachers are underpaid.

https://www.teacherportal.com/teacher-salaries-by-state/

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#6

One of my relatives retired from teaching a couple of years ago. She had guaranteed raises every year and ended up making close to $100,000/year.

Still low for required education. Also, the raises haven't matched inflation; but that's a larger problem across all jobs.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#7
I’m not so sure, my mom has been a teacher for 6 years and makes around 40k. Similar story for her peers.

And even a 20% raise wouldn’t allow her to afford a home, or to send her kids to college without a huge debt burden...

To be honest, I don’t even really care if that ends up being “in line with industry” some how, that’s still way too damn low. At that point everyone should be paid more.

EDIT: realize I mistyped wage, my points still stand about houses or college, and it’s not like her wages will go up much.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#8
post #5

One of my relatives retired from teaching a couple of years ago. She had guaranteed raises every year and ended up making close to $100,000/year.

Good for her! Unfortunately, your anecdote is not representative. Many older teachers are getting forced out because, well, they're expensive and new teachers are underpaid. https://www.teacherportal.com/teacher-salaries-by-state/

> Unfortunately, your anecdote is not representative.

Of teachers starting today? Probably not.

Older government employees often had ludicrously lucrative compensation packages compared to what we have now.

It may or may not depending on what group we're talking about.

> Many older teachers are getting forced out because, well, they're expensive

Do you have information for that one, the link provided just lists starting and average salaries.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#9
I am willing to accept that there are studies and statistics that seem to contradict what is commonly accepted. I'm also willing to accept a lot of the evidence here that the problem is not nearly as bad as believed.

This was, however, clearly written by statisticians that have no teacher friends or family. If they did, they would have asked more relevant questions of the data. For example WHY do teachers work "on average 40.6 hours during the work week, compared to 42.4 hours for private-sector professionals".

My wife is a teacher, and I can tell you exactly why.

Also, I laughed particularly hard at "teaching jobs are not particularly stressful or unpleasant compared to other occupations"

Hilarious.

Re: The myth of the teacher pay gap?

#10
This seems to use private education as a benchmark for the entire argument. From quit rates, to pay, to conditions, and beyond, but ignores the obvious which is that private pay and private conditions are largely pinned to be just above public salaries and conditions (meaning private education cannot be used as a benchmark for when someone is under-paid, over-qualified, or has too high of a quit rate because they are related).

Personally I think someone required to have a degree (master's for quoted salary), continued education requirements, and licensing earning under $50K/year starting is too low. Plus no teacher is working 8-3, you'd have no opportunity for lesson planning, grading, and all those extra curriculars they are essentially guilted into organizing.

The fact that I could walk out of college with zero experience and only a degree, and earn $20K more than that working only 9-5 in the same city seems unfair (as a programmer). But I have no idea how society decides salaries. It seems pretty arbitrary from my perspective.

But it is great that at the end of a long career a few unicorn teachers can earn $100K, a salary I earned within 5 years and still no master's or licencing.

Post reply on HN