Live data from Hacker News

Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

fbo.gov

1–10 of 25 posts

Re: Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

#2
Where does it say they provide facial recognition software? I looked through the attached "Limited Sources Justification" PDF and the three areas they claim to be using Adobe software for are "Digital Media" (this is Acrobat and Reader), "Digital Marketing" (Creative Suite) and "Digital Meetings".

Maybe this is the wrong contract??

Re: Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

#4

Where does it say they provide facial recognition software? I looked through the attached "Limited Sources Justification" PDF and the three areas they claim to be using Adobe software for are "Digital Media" (this is Acrobat and Reader), "Digital Marketing" (Creative Suite) and "Digital Meetings". Maybe this is the wrong contract??

If this is wrong why is this not still taken out ?

Re: Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

#7

It's perfectly legal and fine for companies to provide products and services to their home governments. What's the issue here?

Ok, but sometimes our moral compass points away from these things and we need to make hard decisions to do the right thing.

Re: Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

#8

Where does it say they provide facial recognition software? I looked through the attached "Limited Sources Justification" PDF and the three areas they claim to be using Adobe software for are "Digital Media" (this is Acrobat and Reader), "Digital Marketing" (Creative Suite) and "Digital Meetings". Maybe this is the wrong contract??

The only thing I can come up with is there is a part that says something like “user-facing, business-facing” which seems like what may have been confused? The LSG only talks about using well known adobe products.

https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=6f4e5737cc7bd661210bf56766...

Re: Adobe Provides facial recognition Software for DHS and ICE

#9

It's perfectly legal and fine for companies to provide products and services to their home governments. What's the issue here?

Legal maybe, moral idk, given what they do.

If there's a morality issue, that should be directed at the government.
Post reply on HN