Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
arstechnica.com
Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#2[deleted]
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#3[deleted]
[deleted]
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#4[deleted]
[deleted]
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#5Now imagine working for him and you can see one of the reasons why Tesla's executive turnover is so high. Unfortunately, I think Musk needs to get slapped with a few more lawsuits before he'll learn to set aside the social media nonsense and just focus on being an eccentric innovator.
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#6Now imagine working for him and you can see one of the reasons why Tesla's executive turnover is so high. Unfortunately, I think Musk needs to get slapped with a few more lawsuits before he'll learn to set aside the social media nonsense and just focus on being an eccentric innovator.
[deleted]
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#750k as a percentage of Musk's net worth (20b) is the same as 25 cents for the avg. American (net worth 100k).
Few people would have qualms paying 25 cents to potentially get back at someone who annoyed them.
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#850k as a percentage of Musk's net worth (20b) is the same as 25 cents for the avg. American (net worth 100k). Few people would have qualms paying 25 cents to potentially get back at someone who annoyed them.
If everyone could afford to hire a PI to dig up dirt on some random person they didn’t like, it would be a highly regulated industry. Because it’s mainly a service only the powerful or wealthy can afford no one bothers.
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#9The fact that the Vice reporter turned around and published an email that Musk clearly intended to be private is really pretty dirty. If anyone should be held accountable for damages it should be that guy.
Re: Musk spent $50k digging into critic’s personal life
#10The fact that the Vice reporter turned around and published an email that Musk clearly intended to be private is really pretty dirty. If anyone should be held accountable for damages it should be that guy.
Can you explain to me how exactly that relates to this story of Musk wasting $50k to dig into the life of a guy that slighted him? And how that absolves Musk of the fact that he spent said money to violate the privacy of someone else?