Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#2Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#3very interesting! could someone explain why the hot water would lead to deep, cold water being brought to the surface? I thought hot water is less dense than cold water. Wouldn't it just sit on the surface for a long time? Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#4very interesting! could someone explain why the hot water would lead to deep, cold water being brought to the surface? I thought hot water is less dense than cold water. Wouldn't it just sit on the surface for a long time? Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#5very interesting! could someone explain why the hot water would lead to deep, cold water being brought to the surface? I thought hot water is less dense than cold water. Wouldn't it just sit on the surface for a long time? Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
The lava is pouring into the deeper cold water and causing it to rise. At least that’s how I read it.
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#6very interesting! could someone explain why the hot water would lead to deep, cold water being brought to the surface? I thought hot water is less dense than cold water. Wouldn't it just sit on the surface for a long time? Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
I think it's that, as the lava sinks to the ocean floor, it warms the colder, nutrient rich water at depth and causes it to rise.
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#7very interesting! could someone explain why the hot water would lead to deep, cold water being brought to the surface? I thought hot water is less dense than cold water. Wouldn't it just sit on the surface for a long time? Or is there just such a large amount of this extremely hot water that the mixing overtime generates movement across the board?
(Also a huge huge carbon sink, might negate the volcano's CO2 emissions)
10.1126/science.aax4767
Subsequent remotely operated vehicle observations during September 2018 confirmed that lava intrusions ultimately reached depths of 725 m, and low-temperature venting directly associated with the fresh lava deposits was also observed (23). Upwelled waters from this depth would contain sufficient concentrations of nitrate to fuel the observed phytoplankton bloom. After the lava flow substantially decreased on 6 August, the much smaller flow that lasted for an additional month was insufficient to cause buoyant plumes of nutrient-rich deep water
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#8This volcano has provided a natural demonstration of this effect.
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#9Pumping nutrient rich water from the deep ocean to the surface is one proposed way of increasing ocean productivity to repair fish stocks and sequester carbon. This volcano has provided a natural demonstration of this effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_fertilization
Re: Kīlauea volcano eruption fosters algae bloom in North Pacific Ocean
#10Pumping nutrient rich water from the deep ocean to the surface is one proposed way of increasing ocean productivity to repair fish stocks and sequester carbon. This volcano has provided a natural demonstration of this effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_fertilization
Fish, yes, but it doesn't help with global warming. The problem is that while you sequester a lot of carbon you end up converting some of the carbon from CO2 to CH4--and that's a much stronger greenhouse gas.