Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
blog.containo.us
Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#2So glad to see this supports SMI. That makes introduction of these new implementations much more digestible
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#3So glad to see this supports SMI. That makes introduction of these new implementations much more digestible
Thanks! We deeply believe that the best infrastructure products are open and free from vendor lock-in.
Being compliant to SMI will make both Maesh and the specifications stronger.
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#4Is it like running Istio-ingressgateway only, without mesh expansion and sidecar injection? It looks simpler than Istio, but I'm on mobile and will try Maesh on a test cluster later.
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#5Kudos for the traefik team. I've just started to use it an is amazing.
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#6This looks like an interesting off the shelf alternative to Envoy, which currently requires you to implement your own control plane. Moving forward, is this going to be open-core with a paid EE edition type of thing like Traefik?
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#7From the description, and given who developed it, is this basically a way to run a Traefik instance per node and have the instance dynamically configure itself using the Kubernetes API? Or is there more to it?
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#8Should work on OpenShift too right?
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#9Ooh. I look forward to deploying this on Iron Arachne's stack.
Re: Maesh, a Lightweight and Simpler Service Mesh
#10So API gateways are becoming Services Meshes and Service Meshes are becoming API gateways. Have we reached critical mass on number of solutions? Will they start to consolidate?