Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
businessroundtable.org
Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
1–10 of 211 posts
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#2If they really intend to switch gears and prioritize other stakeholders, that may require some enforceable agreements among them to prevent competition from causing a race to the bottom, and I wonder if such agreements would be legal.
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#3Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#4Are they trying to get ahead of government regulation with this? It looks like a declaration of self-regulation to me. If they really intend to switch gears and prioritize other stakeholders, that may require some enforceable agreements among them to prevent competition from causing a race to the bottom, and I wonder if such agreements would be legal.
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#5Are they trying to get ahead of government regulation with this? It looks like a declaration of self-regulation to me. If they really intend to switch gears and prioritize other stakeholders, that may require some enforceable agreements among them to prevent competition from causing a race to the bottom, and I wonder if such agreements would be legal.
I think it's more a bit like the Henry Ford deal where he insisted on paying his workers enough to actually be able to afford the cars. Anemic demand is one of those things that can get an economy stuck in a low-growth poverty trap.
Either that or they're trying to get ahead of the guillotines.
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#6The thoughts and feelings of these CEOs mean nothing unless it's predicated/followed by regulatory change.
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#7Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#8Are they trying to get ahead of government regulation with this? It looks like a declaration of self-regulation to me. If they really intend to switch gears and prioritize other stakeholders, that may require some enforceable agreements among them to prevent competition from causing a race to the bottom, and I wonder if such agreements would be legal.
>Are they trying to get ahead of government regulation with this? It looks like a declaration of self-regulation to me. I think it's more a bit like the Henry Ford deal where he insisted on paying his workers enough to actually be able to afford the cars. Anemic demand is one of those things that can get an economy stuck in a low-growth poverty trap. Either that or they're trying to get ahead of the guillotines.
Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#9Re: Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation
#10At first glance, this seems like a terrific move. In recent decades, this trend of shareholder primacy has been more than evident. CEOs are expected to lead their companies to more and more performance quarter by quarter, rather than focusing on the long-term prospect -- sometimes even at the cost of it.
Let's hope that this "shareholders first, at all costs" mantra finally dies. There's more than one dimension to success, especially future success.