Don't be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Don't be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons
#2It wasn't autonomous, but Dallas police killed a sniper with a robot placing c4 explosives on the back of a wall he was leaning on. https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/us/dallas-police-robot-c4-exp...
Re: Don't be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons
#3> This report investigates the role of the global tech sector in the development of lethal autonomous weapons, or killer robots.
Geesh, I'm glad they're not using emotional language there.
Re: Don't be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons
#4It wasn't autonomous, but Dallas police killed a sniper with a robot placing c4 explosives on the back of a wall he was leaning on. https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/us/dallas-police-robot-c4-exp...
Recoil on a bot is bad. Guessing they start making structural explosives.
Re: Don't be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons
#5> This report investigates the role of the global tech sector in the development of lethal autonomous weapons, or killer robots. Geesh, I'm glad they're not using emotional language there.
I find it funny in not using emotional languages for war, but using emotional languages for crime, so you can "think about the children" (tm). Tells you a lot about power structures.